Bummer that Walker went to the Phillies. I hope that doesn’t come back to haunt us in the playoffs. My question is about the team’s effort. The Dodgers are 10-10 in their last 20 games, but they have a healthy winning percentage against GOOD teams an astonishing LOSING record against sub-.500 teams. How do we explain this? (And we’re about to start a roadie against losing teams.)
Stephen Nelson and Rick Monday chatted again this week about the silliness of Ohtani batting leadoff when he pitches. I still find it unconscionable given Dr ElAttrache’s views on fatigue and injuries. Now that we have a decent sample size, have you seen any numbers to back up the stupidity of having Shohei rush off the mound to get ready to hit first?
Last year Shohei Ohtani won NL MVP, but not without pushback. Many argued Francisco Lindor deserved it because he was a position player, while Shohei was “just a DH.” East Coast Media even pointed to David "Big Papi" Ortiz, who twice finished 2nd for the same reason.
Ohtani had to do something historic to win: fastest ever to 40-40, first to 50-50, and one of the greatest single games in MLB history—6-for-6 with 3 HR, 2 doubles, 10 RBIs, 2 steals, and 17 total bases (nearly 4 HR and 19 TB).
Last week Kyle Schwarber hit MLB’s 21st 4-HR game: 4-for-6, 9 RBIs, 16 total bases. Great, but still shy of Shohei’s totals. Some said if he’d gotten a 5th HR, it would have surpassed Ohtani. Shohei’s double off the wall was closer to a home run than Schwarber’s routine flyout in his last at-bat (off a position player like Kiki).
This year Shohei is also pitching with strong numbers while Schwarber remains "just a DH." Yet listening to the East Coast Media, you'd have thought Schwarber solved World Peace in that game.
So my question: Is the East Coast Media being hypocritical—downplaying Shohei while inflating Schwarber? Last year they argued Lindor deserved MVP because he was in the field while Shohei was “just a DH.” This year Shohei is DH/Pitching and Schwarber is "just a DH", yet they flip the script. Is this like the attitude of the East Coast Media in college football rankings: “Do they even know football exists west of the Mississippi?” Or am I imagining it? So which is it? Hypocrisy, bias, or just winter click-bait with headlines like, ‘Schwarber’s Free Agency: NL MVP in talks with ___’?
Either way, it feels like they’ve moved the goalposts again—because when it’s Ohtani, the bar is impossibly high, and when it’s Schwarber, suddenly “just a DH” is good enough. I’m beginning to think Shohei could pitch, hit, steal, and sell Dodger Dogs between innings, and Schwarber would still walk away with MVP for dropping five bunts in a September game.
Do you think they didn't pick up Buehler again because he wanted to START, rather than come out of the bullpen? I think he would be a better RP right now than Yates, and even
Do you think they will give Miller an opportunity to pitch relief in September to see how he does?
Bummer that Walker went to the Phillies. I hope that doesn’t come back to haunt us in the playoffs. My question is about the team’s effort. The Dodgers are 10-10 in their last 20 games, but they have a healthy winning percentage against GOOD teams an astonishing LOSING record against sub-.500 teams. How do we explain this? (And we’re about to start a roadie against losing teams.)
Stephen Nelson and Rick Monday chatted again this week about the silliness of Ohtani batting leadoff when he pitches. I still find it unconscionable given Dr ElAttrache’s views on fatigue and injuries. Now that we have a decent sample size, have you seen any numbers to back up the stupidity of having Shohei rush off the mound to get ready to hit first?
Honestly, I think Ohtani does whatever Ohtani wants to do...
Last year Shohei Ohtani won NL MVP, but not without pushback. Many argued Francisco Lindor deserved it because he was a position player, while Shohei was “just a DH.” East Coast Media even pointed to David "Big Papi" Ortiz, who twice finished 2nd for the same reason.
Ohtani had to do something historic to win: fastest ever to 40-40, first to 50-50, and one of the greatest single games in MLB history—6-for-6 with 3 HR, 2 doubles, 10 RBIs, 2 steals, and 17 total bases (nearly 4 HR and 19 TB).
Last week Kyle Schwarber hit MLB’s 21st 4-HR game: 4-for-6, 9 RBIs, 16 total bases. Great, but still shy of Shohei’s totals. Some said if he’d gotten a 5th HR, it would have surpassed Ohtani. Shohei’s double off the wall was closer to a home run than Schwarber’s routine flyout in his last at-bat (off a position player like Kiki).
This year Shohei is also pitching with strong numbers while Schwarber remains "just a DH." Yet listening to the East Coast Media, you'd have thought Schwarber solved World Peace in that game.
So my question: Is the East Coast Media being hypocritical—downplaying Shohei while inflating Schwarber? Last year they argued Lindor deserved MVP because he was in the field while Shohei was “just a DH.” This year Shohei is DH/Pitching and Schwarber is "just a DH", yet they flip the script. Is this like the attitude of the East Coast Media in college football rankings: “Do they even know football exists west of the Mississippi?” Or am I imagining it? So which is it? Hypocrisy, bias, or just winter click-bait with headlines like, ‘Schwarber’s Free Agency: NL MVP in talks with ___’?
Either way, it feels like they’ve moved the goalposts again—because when it’s Ohtani, the bar is impossibly high, and when it’s Schwarber, suddenly “just a DH” is good enough. I’m beginning to think Shohei could pitch, hit, steal, and sell Dodger Dogs between innings, and Schwarber would still walk away with MVP for dropping five bunts in a September game.
Conforto!!! That is all!
Do you think they didn't pick up Buehler again because he wanted to START, rather than come out of the bullpen? I think he would be a better RP right now than Yates, and even
Scott, especially for one inning.